spssforum.com

by SPSS users, for SPSS users
SPSSVideoTutor.com
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:17 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 5:33 pm
Posts: 2
Hello

I found some very bizar results, so I would like to check how this is possible.

First analysis:
I did a number of linear regression analyses. In a first block, I added my three control variables. In the second block, I added my four independent testing variables to the model, so a total of seven variables.

Second analysis:
Then I did the same again, but instead of adding the four variables in the second block, I only added one of these four (because of multicollinearity with the other three independents). So the first block has again the three control variables, my second block has the three control variables and one independent that is tested.

The question:
As the first block of the first analysis is exactly the same as the first block of the second analysis, this should give identical results, isn't it? Well, it isn't! How is that possible? Checking further, it turns out that only analyzing the first block (so not adding a second block) gives the results of the second analysis. Why is the result in the first analysis different? Is this an error is SPSS?

You can see the results in attachment.

Thank you for your help!


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:58 pm
Posts: 463
Because the sample sizes are not the same.

In your analysis 1, the df2 is 52; but in analysis 2, the df2 is 55. Aka, there three more subjects included in analysis 2.

The reason is probably due to missing data in independent 2, 3, and 4 in analysis 1. I bet there are three cases in analysis 1 that had missings in independent 2, 3, and 4, and hence they were excluded from the overall analysis, lowering the df2 of block 1 in analysis 1 by 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 5:33 pm
Posts: 2
Wow, super, thank you very much for this quick replay and for this solution. That is indeed the answer!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group